Home About Who We Are Publications Contact

Publications

Interdisciplinary research at the intersection of AI, Criminology, and Ethics.

ArXiv Preprint Computer Vision AI Ethics May 2025

Towards AI-Driven Policing: Interdisciplinary Knowledge Discovery from Police Body-Worn Camera Footage

Anita Srbinovska, Angela Srbinovska, Vivek Senthil, Adrian Martin, John McCluskey, Jonathan Bateman, Ernest Fokoué
Abstract: This paper proposes a novel interdisciplinary framework for analyzing police body-worn camera (BWC) footage from the Rochester Police Department (RPD) using advanced artificial intelligence (AI) and statistical machine learning (ML) techniques. Our goal is to detect, classify, and analyze patterns of interaction between police officers and civilians to identify key behavioral dynamics, such as respect, disrespect, escalation, and de-escalation...
CrimRxiv Criminology Methodology May 2025

Beyond the Lens: Integrating Interdisciplinary Expertise for Enhanced Knowledge Discovery from Police Body-Worn Camera Footage

Angela Srbinovska, Jonathan Bateman, Anita Srbinovska, John McCluskey, Adrian Martin, Ernest Fokoué
Abstract: A comprehensive examination of integrating domain expertise from criminology with computer science methodologies. This study addresses the challenges of validating AI models in high-stakes environments and proposes a collaborative workflow for enhancing the utility and reliability of BWC data analysis in policing reform.
arXiv PrePrint NLP Knowledge Representation May 2026

Ontology for Policing: Conceptual Knowledge Learning for Semantic Understanding and Reasoning in Law Enforcement Reports

Anita Srbinovska, Jansen Orfan, Adrian Martin, Ernest Fokoué
Abstract: Law enforcement reports contain structured fields and written narratives. However, many incident facts that are needed for review, police training, and investigations are in natural language and require manual reading. We propose a framework using symbolic methods for converting narratives into evidence-linked facts. Our objective is to measure the value of narratives to recover incident details only from the unstructured text and build temporal graphs with time cues and domain axioms. We achieve this by redacting personal identifiers, semantic parsing, predicate mapping to ontology, and reasoning. We evaluate the symbolic approach on 450 property crime reports and a short human review. Of the extracted events from the system, 54.1% had a confidence score of at least 0.80 and 93.7% were mapped through the PropBank–VerbNet–WordNet semantic path. 100% agreement was reached on incident initiation, stolen items, and temporal cues and lower agreement for forced entry interpretation.
arXiv PrePrint Computer Vision BWC Analysis May 2026

Visual Timelines of Police Encounters in Body-Worn Camera Footage: Operational Context and Activity Cataloging for Training and Analysis in OpenBWC

Angela Srbinovska, Christopher Homan, Adrian Martin, Ernest Fokoué
Abstract: Law enforcement agencies are accumulating vast amounts of body-worn camera (BWC) footage. However, this remains operationally opaque. That is, analysts and trainers still have to invest considerable time watching full-length videos to pinpoint the start of key encounters and identify the points where activity shifts to something more physically intense. We present an approach to process BWC video into a time-aligned sequence of fixed-length 10-second windows, processed and labeled using a privacy-conscious protocol. Each window is labeled with two dimensions of information: (i) the operational context of the window and (ii) the level of motion intensity within the window, with low-evidence labels for windows for which insufficient evidence exists due to darkness, blur or occlusion. We train models to classify windows based on these two axes using frames sampled from each window encoded using CLIP model and aggregated into a window-level representation. We extract dense optical flow statistics for each window to capture motion intensity. On test windows the best context model achieves 78.75% accuracy, and the best-accuracy activity model achieves 88.33%. We also included integrity audits to show the results and how the visual timeline representations support faster incident review and make the officer training workflow more practical.